MHSMOBILE HABITAT STANDARD
CAMPERSTECHNICALTRAVELNEWS
MHS · REMOVABLE MOBILE HABITATS

The global knowledge portal for removable mobile habitats.

Compare campers, understand their systems, solve technical questions, discover real journeys and follow the industry in one independent platform.

100-point ratingEvidence-based recordsTechnical knowledgeTravel & field reportsVerified incident evidence

Top rated modules

The twenty highest ranked assessed configurations currently published by MHS.

RankManufacturer / ModelCountryEvidenceRatingClass
Loading current MHS rating…

MHS classes

The full MHS scale runs from 0 to 100 points.

How MHS works
A+90–100
A75–89.9
B60–74.9
C45–59.9
D30–44.9
E20–29.9
F0–19.9

MHS NEWS

Independent coverage of products, manufacturers, technology, market developments, events and regulation.

All news

Loading MHS News…

MHS CAMPER DATABASE

Explore removable campers.

Browse the MHS market catalog, filter by vehicle fitment and technical specifications, compare assessed products and open a structured profile for every published model.

–Catalog records
–Assessed
–Manufacturers
–Countries
⌕
Loading database…Structured MHS market records
Open ranking →
Loading MHS Camper Database…
MHS TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE

The engineering encyclopedia behind mobile habitats.

Understand the components inside a camper, how complete systems are built and how the engineering works in practice. MHS Technical connects equipment, system architecture, guides and confirmed camper installations.

Explore by system

Start with the subsystem you are trying to understand. Each system connects architecture, components, guides and camper installations.

Loading knowledge records…

Technical records

Foundation records for the MHS Technical Knowledge Base.

One engineering layer across MHS

A camper profile tells you what product exists. Technical explains what is inside it, how the system works and which exact components are confirmed in real camper records.

COMPONENTA specific piece of equipment and its verified manufacturer data.
SYSTEMThe architecture that connects multiple components into one working subsystem.
GUIDEA practical explanation of an engineering question or design decision.
CAMPER LINKConfirmed installations connect technical records back to real products.
MHS TECHNICAL / SYSTEM 01

Power & Electrical

The electrical system is the energy backbone of a mobile habitat. This page shows the architecture from charging sources to storage, distribution, conversion, protection and monitoring, then links each layer to the MHS component and guide records that explain it.

System architecture

This is a conceptual architecture, not an installation wiring diagram. Exact cable sizes, protection devices, charging limits and grounding depend on the selected equipment and vehicle.

Vehicle alternator
→
DC/DC charger
→
House battery
Solar array
→
MPPT controller
→
House battery
Shore power
→
Inverter / charger
↔
House battery
House battery
→
DC distribution + protection
→
12 V loads
House battery
→
Inverter
→
AC loads
Monitoring sits across the architecture rather than in the power path: shunts, chargers, inverter/chargers and gateways report energy flow and device state without replacing hardwired protection.

What the system has to do

  • Accept energy from the vehicle, solar and shore-power sources that are actually installed.
  • Store energy in the house battery within the battery and BMS operating limits.
  • Distribute DC power with branch protection and service isolation.
  • Convert DC to AC when an inverter is part of the camper architecture.
  • Expose enough monitoring to understand battery state and charging behaviour.

MHS records in this system

← Back to Technical
MHS / Technical

Dometic CFX3 55:一款 55 L 单区压缩机制冷/冷冻机

便携式 55 L 单区 CFX3 冷藏/冷冻箱,配备 12/24 V DC 和 100–240 V AC 运行功能、应用监控以及低至 −22°C 的制冷范围。

Overview

CFX3 55 是什么

Dometic CFX3 55 是一款便携式单区压缩机制冷/冷冻机。在支持的温度范围内,它既可作为冰箱使用,也可作为冷冻柜使用。

不要将此确切型号与外观相似的 CFX3 55IM 混淆,后者增加了集成式制冰机,产品详情也不同。MHS 将这两个组件分开列示。

为什么 55 L 很重要

Dometic公布 CFX3 55 的 55 L 总容量。这是这款单区型号的完整腔体容量。

55 L 的容量并不能告诉你具体用户可以携带多少天的食物。包装、瓶子尺寸,以及腔体作为冰箱还是冷冻柜运行,都会影响空间的实际使用感受。

单区意味着一个温度目标

与双区 CFX3 75DZ 和 95DZ 型号不同,CFX3 55 只有一个主要温度区。

你可以将其用于冷藏食物或冷冻食物,但不能同时将一半作为冰箱、另一半作为独立控制的冷冻柜运行。

在比较露营舱设备清单时,这一区别很重要。

制冷范围

当前的 Dometic 页面说明,CFX3 55 可在 +20°C 至 −22°C 之间制冷。

这是设备在适用条件下的能力,并不保证温热食物在炎热、封闭的露营舱内会立即达到 −22°C。

环境温度、通风、装载情况以及开盖频率都会影响所需时间和总能耗。

AC 和 DC 电源

Dometic 在该型号的 CFX3 系列技术数据中记录了使用 12/24 V DC 和 100–240 V AC 运行的情况。

这使冷藏/冷冻箱在露营舱中具有灵活性:旅行或离网时可以使用车载电池运行,在具备合适营地接入条件时则可以使用市电。

MHS 的说明。具备 AC 和 DC 功能,并不能免除正确布线、安装保险丝以及确保插头连接牢固的需要。

额定电流

当前 CFX3 关于 55 的技术文档列出,在 12 V 下约为 8.7 A,在 24 V 下为 3.7 A,在市电电压下的 AC 电流更低。

这些数值描述的是参考条件下的运行电流。压缩机会循环工作,因此不应将其视为固定的 24-hour 功耗。

规划续航时,随时间变化的能耗比单个瞬时安培读数更重要。

应用监控

CFX3 55 支持通过 Wi‑Fi 或 Bluetooth 使用 CFX3 App,从而实现温度控制和性能监控。

这是本地/无线设备控制。它并不自动意味着可以从另一个国家通过互联网远程访问该冰箱。

露营舱自身的路由器或其他网络设备是独立的系统。

电池保护

Dometic 包含三级动态电池保护功能。

这有助于降低供电电池过度放电的风险,尤其是在连接车辆启动电池时。

MHS 的说明。设备级低电压保护不能替代露营舱的 BMS、主要低电压策略或正确的支路电路保护。

为什么便携式冷藏/冷冻箱仍需要牢固安装

CFX3 的设计具有便携性,但装载了 55 L 的冷藏/冷冻箱在行驶中的车辆内会成为一个重物。

露营舱应提供牢固的位置或约束系统,防止其在制动或崎岖道路条件下移动。

箱盖还需要有足够的间隙,以便打开时不会碰到家具或其他设备。

压缩机周围的通风

压缩机和冷凝器需要将热量排放到周围空气中。

紧密封闭的柜体可能增加运行时间和能耗。不要用床上用品、行李或软质收纳物堵住通风区域。

如果 Scout 或其他露营舱制造商将冷藏/冷冻箱放置在专用舱位中,请确认装载物品后预定的空气通道仍保持畅通。

温度显示与食物温度

显示屏报告的是冷藏/冷冻箱感测到的运行温度。

大容器中的食物可能需要更长时间才能达到该温度,尤其是在装入温热食品之后。

MHS 的说明。出于食品安全考虑,不要因为已经选择了设定点,就假定刚装入的冷藏/冷冻箱已经完全冷却。

冷冻使用与电池需求

在深度冷冻温度下运行通常比维持普通冰箱温度需要更多能量,尤其是在炎热天气中。

如果同一露营舱的太阳能有限或电池组较小,选择 −20°C 而不是 +4°C 会改变每日能量平衡。

正确的问题不仅是“它能否达到 −22°C?”,还包括“我的电气系统能够支持我计划的使用方式多长时间?”

区域和 SKU 差异

Dometic 销售区域性的 CFX3 55 SKU。不同市场和修订版本之间,插头样式、随附市电电缆以及公布的重量可能略有不同。

因此,MHS 将该组件锚定为型号 CFX3 55,并不声称某一个区域性 SKU 或插头具有普遍适用性。

在 Scout Olympic Pop-Up 中应检查什么

Scout 在 Olympic Pop-Up 中标识了一款选定的 Dometic CFX3 55-L 冰箱/冷冻柜,带 Wi‑Fi。

这一措辞与 CFX3 55 相符,而不是 CFX3 55IM,因为露营舱来源未提及制冰机,并明确给出了 55 L 配置。

交付时,确认标签写有 CFX3 55,检查约束/收纳安排,并测试电池供电和应用连接。

CFX3 55 无法证明什么

配备这台冰箱并不能告诉我们:

  • 露营舱电池的容量;
  • 太阳能阵列的尺寸;
  • 是否始终可以使用岸电;
  • 断电后食物可以保持低温多长时间;
  • 或露营舱是否具有基于互联网的远程监控功能。

这些是独立的系统事实。

关键结论

Dometic CFX3 55 是一款灵活的 55 L 单区压缩机制冷/冷冻机,具备 DC/AC 电源和应用监控功能。实际的离网实用性取决于牢固安装、通风以及露营舱每日的能量预算。

来源

Where it fits

  • 卡车露营舱中的便携式单区冷藏/冷冻
  • 使用可选 AC 市电的 12/24 V 离网冷藏
  • 紧凑型露营舱中通过应用监控的食物储存

What to verify

  • 确认是 CFX3 55 而不是 CFX3 55IM
  • 确保冷藏/冷冻箱适合车辆行驶
  • 保持压缩机通风畅通
  • 在电池预算中纳入现实的冰箱/冷冻柜能耗
  • 确认区域性电缆和供电电压

Design notes

确切的 CFX3 55 型号。区域层面的 SKU- 重量/电缆差异可能存在;配备制冰机的 CFX3 55IM 是独立组件。

← Back to Technical
MHS TRAVEL & FIELD

Documented journeys, not travel inspiration.

MHS Travel connects routes, vehicles, removable campers and field events into structured evidence from real journeys.

Published journeys0
Distance documented0 km
Countries0
Field events0
Loading documented journeys…

Field evidence belongs to the product record.

A journey is useful when it records what actually happened: distance, weather, road mix, failures, repairs, autonomy and the exact vehicle/camper combination. MHS keeps those observations linked instead of turning them into disconnected travel stories.

Structured journey record
Route · dates · distance · temperatures · road mix · vehicle · camper · field events · source · evidence level.
Have a documented removable-camper journey?

Send MHS the source, route and equipment details. We can structure it as a field record.

Contact MHS
MHS / Travel / Journey
–

Journey

Field report

–

← Back to Travel
MHS / Global Rating

Global Rating

Full published MHS list. Rank is determined by the current MHS assessment, while the public table shows only the information needed to identify and compare records.

Loading…
Current models–public catalog
Assessed–published MHS assessments
80+ score–public +40 scale
Top score–current public leader

MHS Top 10

The current leaders among models with a published MHS assessment.

–
Loading leaders…
80+–
70–79.5–
60–69.5–
<60–
Rating filters are literal: no hidden weighting or recommendation logic is applied here.
RankManufacturer / ModelCountryEvidenceRatingClass
Loading current MHS rating…
MHS / Find My Habitat
MHS Match · BETA

Find the habitat that fits your use

MHS Match first removes modules that conflict with your hard requirements. It then compares the remaining products against your travel profile and priorities. MHS Score and Match Score are intentionally separate.

Matching logic
1Hard compatibility filters
2Must-have requirements
3Weighted personal fit
4Diverse 3–5 model shortlist

Vehicle compatibility

These answers create hard filters. A product that cannot fit the selected vehicle class or installation type is removed before scoring.

Step 1 of 4

How will you use it?

These inputs describe the operating environment and living profile. They affect Match Score, not the product’s MHS Score.

Step 2 of 4

Must have or just preferred?

A Must-have is a hard filter. Prefer affects the Match Score. Doesn’t matter is ignored.

Step 3 of 4
Four-season heating
Internal shower
Toilet
Air conditioning
Pop-up roof
Solar + lithium
Central digital control
Advanced safety monitoring

Choose your top priorities

Select up to three. They receive extra weight only after all hard filters are applied.

Step 4 of 4
3 of 3 priorities selected.
1,100 kg
No budget question: MHS does not filter the shortlist by price. You decide what you are willing to offer after seeing suitable modules.

Your MHS Match shortlist

The shortlist is intentionally diverse: Best Overall, Lightweight, Winter, Technology and Alternative.

Results
Vehicle–
Exact matches–
Priorities–
Max dry mass–
Prototype data warning: the matching logic is final-form, but the fit/feature attributes are still a prototype dataset. Before publication they must be populated from the audited MHS evidence database.

Interested in several candidates?
Select models and send the same buyer offer to all of them. MHS will create separate manufacturer enquiries internally.

What happens after you make an offer?

No account is required at the MVP stage.

1. MHS receives your requestYour contact details, selected module, vehicle, timeframe and price appear in the MHS admin queue.
2. MHS contacts the manufacturerWe manually send a structured enquiry from MHS. Your personal contact details are not automatically passed on.
3. MHS contacts youIf the manufacturer accepts, counters or asks for clarification, MHS follows up by email or phone.
MHS / Reliability Research
MHS INCIDENT EVIDENCE

Reliability starts with evidence, not a ranking.

MHS is building a model-specific record of real failures, repairs and field incidents. The current phase measures evidence coverage and exposure. It does not name a “most reliable” camper before the data are comparable.

Current model coverage – / –
Loading verified incident evidence…
Verified incident cases–Distinct cases. A failure and its repair remain one case.
Incident source URLs–Unique public URLs supporting current-model incident cases.
Technical cases–Camper system, supplier component or unknown technical origin.
Failure / repair rows–Event rows in the journal; not the same as independent incidents.
Data collection phase

What the current numbers mean

Coverage tells us where MHS has verified incident evidence. It does not tell us which model is more reliable.

One problem = one incident case

If a component fails and is later repaired, MHS links those records to the same incident case instead of counting two failures. This prevents repair documentation from artificially worsening a model’s record.

The public case count is therefore intentionally lower than the number of failure / repair event rows.

Not every incident is a reliability penalty

Physical damage caused by an external event or by user operation can be useful field evidence, but it should not reduce technical reliability.

Technical
–
External damage
–
User operation
–

Evidence acceptance rules

The model identity and the incident itself must both be supported by the source.

Accepted

  • Exact camper model is identifiable from the source.
  • A concrete failure, repair or physical incident is described.
  • A public source URL can be reopened and checked.
  • Model year is retained when known, especially for long-running model names.
  • Official recalls count only when applicability to the exact model is explicit.

Rejected

  • General complaints about a brand or product family.
  • Problems reported for a neighboring model or uncertain subtype.
  • Normal maintenance, preferences or design annoyances without a failure.
  • Vehicle failures that are not failures of the camper.
  • Rumor, second-hand claims or a model guessed from photographs.

Why MHS does not publish a reliability ranking yet

A raw incident count is meaningless without exposure and independent users.

Four incidents across 180,000 documented kilometres can represent stronger field performance than two incidents across 8,000 km. MHS will only compare models when the evidence base is sufficiently broad.

100+models in a valid comparative sample
100,000 kmdocumented exposure per model
50+independent contributors per model

Source transparency

Every published incident must remain traceable to evidence.

What MHS publishes now

Incident cards expose the failure or repair, severity, system area, incident origin and a direct source link. The model page also separates Incidents from ordinary Field Observations.

What MHS does not claim

The number of web pages reviewed during the first research pass was not systematically logged. MHS therefore publishes the exact number of verified incident source URLs, but does not present an invented “pages screened” total or acceptance percentage.

Planned reliability metric

The principal exposure metric is simple enough to audit.

Documented km / technical incident

Technical incident cases are currently defined as camper-system, supplier-component and unknown-origin cases. External damage and user-operation cases remain visible in the journal but are excluded from the technical denominator.

Zero reported incidents

MHS will not display “infinite reliability.” A zero-case record will be stated factually: 0 reported incidents over X documented km.

MHS / Methodology
MHS Methodology

How mobile habitats are rated

MHS evaluates factory-delivered functional and technological capability using a common evidence-based framework.

Maximum MHS Score
100
Functional Score contributes up to 95 points and Functional Density contributes up to 5 additional points.

Scoring architecture

MHS is an absolute capability scale, not a percentile ranking.

Base Functionality
30
Systems Integration
20
Automation
15
Safety & Resilience
15
Sensors & Diagnostics
10
Digital Infrastructure
5
Functional Density
5
MHS Score
100

MHS = Functional Score + Functional Density points. The total maximum is 100 points.

PUBLIC METHODOLOGY

What MHS publishes – and what remains in the Rulebook

MHS publicly discloses the scoring architecture, category weights, assessment principles and class thresholds.

Detailed criterion definitions, eligibility logic and individual point allocations are maintained in the MHS Rulebook. Examples, summaries or interpretations generated by third-party search engines or AI systems do not constitute the official MHS methodology.

Read MHS Scoring Criteria

Core principles

The methodology rewards demonstrated capability rather than marketing claims or component potential.

01 / EVIDENCE

Evidence over claims

Not publicly confirmed means no Public Data credit. This does not mean the function is absent.

02 / CONFIGURATION

Configuration-specific

Optional equipment counts only when included in the exact evaluated configuration.

03 / IMPLEMENTATION

No component inference

Capable hardware does not by itself prove camper-wide implementation.

04 / SNAPSHOT

Dated assessment

Every rating is a dated snapshot of a model, configuration and evidence set.

Factory-Max Configuration

Public Rating compares the strongest valid factory-delivered configuration, not the cheapest base model.

Official definition

The highest-scoring, mutually compatible, production configuration of a specific model that can be ordered from the manufacturer on the assessment date.

Score-max, not equipment-max

An option that adds weight but no MHS capability does not have to be selected merely because it exists.

Price-neutral

MHS measures capability, not value-for-money.

MHS classes

Classes use fixed thresholds across the full 0–100 MHS scale.

A+90–100
A75–89.9
B60–74.9
C45–59.9
D30–44.9
E20–29.9
F0–19.9

Functional Density

More verified capability per unit of dry mass.

FD = FS / dry mass (kg) × 100

Dry mass must correspond to the same complete Factory-Max configuration that earned the Functional Score.

FD below 5.000 pts
5.00–7.491 pt
7.50–9.992 pts
10.00–12.493 pts
12.50–14.994 pts
15.00+5 pts

Provisional display when dry mass is unavailable

If configuration-specific dry mass is not publicly confirmed, Functional Density remains N/A and no FD points are assigned. The public provisional display uses the Functional Score as the verified lower bound, shown with a “+”. Because FD can contribute 0–5 points, the possible final Score range is FS to FS+5 and the possible Class range is shown when a class boundary could be crossed. Numeric Rank is assigned only after dry mass is confirmed and Functional Density is calculated.

MHS / Verification
MHS Verification

Three levels of evidence

The score and the strength of evidence behind it are separate. Verification increases confidence without changing the scoring rules.

Verification ladder
  • 01 · PUBLIC DATA
  • 02 · MANUFACTURER VERIFIED
  • 03 · MHS VERIFIED

Assessment levels

LEVEL 01

PUBLIC DATA

Scored only from publicly accessible manufacturer information and official documentation.

  • Official model pages
  • Configurator / option lists
  • Owner manuals
  • Specification sheets
LEVEL 02

MANUFACTURER VERIFIED

The manufacturer confirms the evaluated configuration and supplies supporting evidence.

  • Configuration confirmation
  • Compatibility confirmation
  • Technical evidence
  • Configuration-specific dry mass
LEVEL 03

MHS VERIFIED

MHS directly verifies configuration and selected functional claims.

  • Inspection
  • Live demonstrations
  • Condition → action tests
  • Failure / fallback tests

What changes between levels

Verification elementPublic DataManufacturer VerifiedMHS Verified
Official public sourcesYESYESYES
Manufacturer confirmationNOYESYES
Non-public technical evidenceNOACCEPTEDACCEPTED
Live functional testingNOOPTIONALYES
MHS functional auditNONOYES

Manufacturer verification process

Manufacturers submit evidence, not score requests.

1

Submit model data

Identify model, region, model year and exact configuration.

2

Provide evidence

Submit official technical documentation and configuration proof.

3

MHS review

Check evidence quality, compatibility and criterion eligibility.

4

Record update

Publish new status, date and score if applicable.

Accepted evidence

  • Official manufacturer specifications
  • Factory order sheets
  • Technical drawings
  • Controller screenshots
  • Dry-weight documentation
  • Video or live demonstrations

Not sufficient by itself

  • Generic component datasheets
  • Dealer-added accessories
  • Marketing claims without support
  • Roadmap or “in development” features
  • Capabilities borrowed from another model
MHS / About
About MHS

One common standard for mobile habitats

MHS is an independent rating framework for comparing functional and technological capability across manufacturers and markets.

Why MHS exists
Comparable products need comparable evidence.

Mission

Our mission

Make mobile habitats measurable

MHS provides a common language for assessing verified capability.

Our objective

Make evidence more important than claims

A feature is credited only when the evaluated model and configuration support it.

Core principles

01 / NEUTRALITY

Same rules for every manufacturer

Brand size, country, price and commercial relationships do not change scoring rules.

02 / EVIDENCE

Claims must be supported

Higher verification levels require stronger evidence.

03 / TRACEABILITY

Every score is dated

Model, configuration, assessment date, level and MHS version remain visible.

04 / CONFIGURATION

No imaginary builds

Factory-Max must be orderable, production-ready and mutually compatible.

05 / PRICE NEUTRALITY

Capability is not value-for-money

Price does not add or subtract MHS points.

06 / CORRECTION

Records can be revised

Better evidence and product changes can trigger a dated reassessment.

Scope

Currently in scope

  • Removable pickup-bed living modules
  • Slide-in truck campers
  • Flatbed pickup campers
  • Current production models
  • Regional variants when equipment differs materially

Outside current scope

  • Permanent motorhome conversions
  • Heavy expedition trucks
  • Travel trailers
  • Roof-top tents
  • One-off custom builds
  • Concept products not orderable

MHS scores are not for sale

Payment, sponsorship, advertising or commercial relationships do not purchase points, class, rank or favorable interpretation.

No paid score increases
No ranking changes for advertising
Corrections require evidence
No manufacturer veto over evidence-based results

What MHS is not

Not a value-for-money ranking

Price is outside the MHS capability score.

Not a popularity ranking

Sales volume and brand recognition do not add points.

Not a legal compliance certificate

MHS does not replace product certification or applicable legal standards.

Not a substitute for buyer priorities

Budget, service access, payload and intended use may still matter greatly.

Contact MHS

Questions, corrections, partnership enquiries or feedback about the platform.

MHS / Submit manufacturer data
Manufacturer Submission

Submit manufacturer data

Provide official evidence to complete, correct or verify your model’s MHS record. MHS applies the same methodology to all manufacturers and does not negotiate scores.

Use this form to
  • Confirm Factory-Max configuration
  • Provide evidence
  • Correct outdated data
  • Request Manufacturer Verified review
  • Prepare for MHS Verified assessment

1. Manufacturer and model

2. Submission purpose

3. Evaluated configuration

4. Official sources

5. Technical evidence

6. Manufacturer contact

Prototype submission received. The live site would create an MHS review case and send a confirmation email.
MHS / Campers / Manufacturer
MANUFACTURER PROFILE

Manufacturer

Current removable-camper model line in the MHS market catalog.

–
Current models–market catalog
Assessed–published MHS assessments
Best score–public MHS scale
Average score–assessed models only

Current model line

Select up to four models to compare.

Loading manufacturer profile…
Manufacturer · Country

Model

–
– Factory-Max PUBLIC DATA CURRENT

Find My Habitat
Country–
Global rank–among assessed
Position–current MHS Rating
Evidence–

What this score means

MHS measures maximum factory-delivered functional and technological capability. It is not a price, value-for-money, popularity or sales ranking.

Assessment basis

Public Data ratings award credit only for functions that can be confirmed from public manufacturer information. Not publicly confirmed means no credit. This does not mean the function is absent.

Evaluated configuration

Configuration–
Assessment Level–
Status–

Public record

This page shows aggregate public information only. Internal section scoring, individual criterion results and audit notes are not published.

TECHNICAL PROFILE

Specifications

Manufacturer-published and MHS-verified model data. Unknown values remain unknown rather than being inferred.

EVIDENCE & FIELD USE

Assessment evidence & real-world use

Public assessment sources plus high-confidence Journey records linked to this exact camper model.

Representative journeys
ASSESSMENT EXPLAINER

Why this score

Publicly confirmed capabilities that help explain the published MHS assessment.

This is a public explanation layer. Internal criterion weights, detailed scoring rules and audit notes are not published.

Evidence & related records

Verified technical references, documented journeys and relevant MHS news linked to this model.

Technical

0
Loading…

Travel

0
Loading…

NEWS

0
Loading…